Sentence examples for vertical governance from inspiring English sources

Unlike Hurricane Hugo, where Montserrat's independence from the UK remained largely unaltered despite huge investments in reconstruction, the volcanic crisis brought about an abrupt realignment of vertical governance arrangements, with the UK government's position towards this overseas territory shifting radically towards greater intervention as the crisis unfolded.

In this case, any level of government below the provincial level implements a vertical governance structure.

In the database, 296 experiments (47%) involved some form of formally recognised partnership between actors at different governance levels, whether this is in terms of vertical governance (e.g. partnerships between local, regional and national governments) or horizontal (e.g. partnerships between governments, civil society organisations and private actors).

Building on work by Claudia Pahl-Wostl (2009) on multi-level learning processes and adaptation, two key aspects of vertical governance dialectics can be identified: (a) dispersion of decision-making authority and (b) vertical coherence.

The analysis of vertical governance arrangements in Montserrat presented below is based on qualitative primary data collected through a 'forensic' workshopb held in September 2012 with 70 participants representing five stakeholder groups: scientists, UK government officials, Montserrat government officials (including disaster managers), regional agency staff and community representatives.

However, in focussing on the dynamics of vertical governance, direct comparisons can be made to governance arrangements in other contexts, including in federal governance systems such as Mexico and India, decentralised systems such as those found elsewhere in the Caribbean and other multi-layered systems of governance, such as the European Union.

International law also informs vertical global governance even though these regimes find no formal expression in international law.

Uncertainty looms, however, in the IHR revision process, questions about WTO's impact on public health, and concerns that vertical global governance will not deliver global public goods for health in an important and sustainable manner.

I disaggregate these into vertical processes (multilevel governance perspectives), horizontal processes (network and policy mobility perspectives), and what I term infrastructural processes (steering by conditions in the built environment).

The foundations for vertical coordination are water governance at every level.

Attention has also shifted from horizontal international governance to vertical global governance.