Schlick interprets the verifiability principle strictly, by spelling out verification in terms of sensible experience, but at the same time broadly, construed to admit any logically conceivable circumstances of verification (like the future verification of mountains on the far side of the moon).
Our framework makes use of more efficient signature generation and verification algorithms in terms of computational complexity than their counterparts in literature, where signature size is almost the same as the shortest signatures proposed for similar purposes so far.
A prototype of the proposed system has been implemented to experimentally analyze and compare the resource efficiency of different SAT verification approaches in terms of a number of performance metrics, including computation and communication overhead.
An automated nondestructive assay system capable of providing enrichment measurements over the full volume of the cylinder could improve upon current verification practices in terms of manpower and assay accuracy.
Figures 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 present the model verification results in terms of water levels, flow velocity, DO concentration, NH4+-N concentrandon and COD concentration, respectively.
Figure4 shows the speaker verification performance in terms of EER for the cortical features and for the MFCC features as a function of noise type/strength and trial condition.
Eighteen and 23 were examined as the worst-case limits, and L s = 23 improved speaker verification performance in terms of equal error rate (EER) for the low SNR levels (− 5 and − 10 dB) as high as absolute 10% compared to L s = 18.
Numerical verification in term of accuracy and efficiency is provided, and the impacts of initial guess, number of measurement points, regional inhomogeneity, and noisy data on the identification are taken into accounts.
Verification are available in terms of cross-validated RPSS and reliability diagrams, constructed from NMME hindcasts.
