Ai Feedback
Exact(31)
- Inspector 2. "… However, some verification items judge features, which are not totally wrong or right".
Table 2 shows part of the verification items for the Data Entry Web page zone.
This means that some verification items could not provide a clear description of which nonconformities must be found, or that the verification items are too subjective for the inspector to decide.
Table 3 Verification items that were not met by the prototyped Web page of the JEMS system N° Web page zone Usability verification items 01 System's State The System's State is naturally and logically presented to the user.
- Inspector 3. Regarding the subjects' opinion towards the examples and explanations provided along with the verification items, all inspectors agreed they were easy to understand and that they also made it easier to understand the usability verification items.
The verification items assess both the consistency of the MoLIC diagrams with the requirements and their completeness.
Similar(29)
In this sense, we present: the identifier of the defect (e.g. "Verification item 1"), the verification item description of the IMID and the type of identified defect.
Verification item 7: Have all requirements been correctly represented in the interaction model?
Verification item 9: Is the content of the interactions between the features consistent with the requirements?
Verification item 4: Are there inconsistent requirements in the interaction model?
Verification item 12: Have all interactions been correctly represented in the interaction model?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com