The phrase "verdict stated" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are referring to a decision that has been made, usually by a court or jury. For example, "After two days of deliberations, the jury finally issued a verdict—guilty on all charges."
The verdict stated that a day after Srebrenica fell, on July 12th, Bosnian Serb forces abandoned an earlier plan to house the thousands of captured Muslim men and boys in a prison camp in the town of Batković.
The verdict stated they relied on "the cover-ups and collusion of government employees" to illegally control gaming machines in Guanghan in Sichuan province.
Cynthia Boris of DVD Verdict stated that the episode had "nice twists".
Similarly, DVD Verdict stated that George and Izzie were "one of the strongest 'best friend' vibes on television" for the first three seasons, explaining "they were perfect as friends [while] George and Callie made a good couple".
On the negative side, describing the episode as a "clunker", Jennifer Malkowski of DVD Verdict stated that the episode is "frightfully thin" and criticized the premise as being "lazy".
However Eric Profancik from DVD Verdict stated that the second series suffered from "poor scripts and horrible acting", criticising it for having "simple plots, too many conveniences and having corny humor".
In a highly unusual move, the judge, Mr Justice Henriques, allowed the jury to insert a rider, or caveat, into the verdict stating that Cressida Dick, the commander in charge of the operation on the day, should not be held personally culpable for the events.
No wonder the label is trying to downplay the implications of a recent US supreme court decision to turn down its appeal of a verdict stating that Eminem and the producers who helped him achieve success should get 50% of all revenue from iTunes downloads – around three times more than what the label has paid them so far.
The Washington Times also gave a positive verdict, stating: "This is one of the funniest games we've ever seen.
The report submitted by this team undergoes a primary discussion at the SWC which then gives a verdict, stating if the project was effective in contributing to fulfilling national agendas or not and makes recommendations about accepting such projects in the future.
While finding in favor of Mr. Stoker, the jurors added a note to their verdict that stated, "This verdict should not deter the S.E.C. from continuing to investigate the financial industry, review current regulations and modify existing regulations as necessary".
