Sentence examples for ventilation approaches from inspiring English sources

The objective of this study was to evaluate markers of ventilator-induced lung injury after two different ventilation approaches: (1) a "conventional" lung-protective strategy (volume control (VC) with low tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and paralysis), (2) a physiological approach with spontaneous breathing, permitting synchrony, variability and a liberated airway.

Different natural ventilation approaches were introduced simultaneously in all selected rooms for four weeks.

Other ventilation approaches namely; daytime, full-day, and no ventilation, were more than 30 °C and had exceeded 32 °C at certain rooms.

The ranking of the effectiveness of the ventilation approaches was in the following order; night ventilation>daytime ventilation>full-day ventilation>no ventilation.

Initially, the effectiveness of different ventilation approaches is obviously influenced by the position/floor level rather than the orientation of the selected rooms.

To better understand the IAQ and energy trade-offs of various ventilation approaches, simulations were performed using the multizone airflow model, CONTAM, for a big box retail store in two climates.

NIV was the first ventilation approach in 28% of cases, with 94% later requiring invasive ventilation, as has been documented in other studies [ 6, 7, 11].

Those patients with a PaO2/FiO2 <200 while on CPAP, or those treated with another noninvasive ventilation approach classified as as having moderate or severe ARDS were excluded.

An initial NIV trial was not effective to avoid intubation in most patients; thus, this ventilation approach should likely be discarded in this setting.

The SIMV + VG mode was associated with the greatest potential to reduce mortality; the probability that this ventilation approach was most effective was 29.7% most likely; the V-C mode was the second-ranked ventilation approach, with a probability of 22.8% most likely.

Ventilation guided by esophageal pressure has beneficial effects in oxygenation and compliance optimization in patients with ARDS [ 89], but this ventilation approach has not been attempted in obese surgical patients.