Exact(3)
Among the computations using various revised k ε models compared here, Durbin's revised k ε model shows the best agreement with the experiment.
This paper compares computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results using various revised k ε models and large eddy simulation (LES) applied to flow around a high-rise building model with 1 1 2 shape placed within the surface boundary layer.
The first part of the paper examines the accuracy of various revised k ε models, i.e. LK model, MMK model and Durbin's revised k ε model, by comparing their results with experimental data.
Similar(57)
Day One: Jeb Bush's Thoughts on Killing Various Other Babies Revised Debate Rules "Houseplants" for D.I.Y.ers Who Have Killed Too Many Houseplants The Promise of Vaping and the Rise of Juul The Lifespan of a Photographer's Marriage, One Portrait of His Partner at a Time The Trouble with Elon Musk and Grimes Subscribe to The New Yorkerfor only $1 a week.Plus, get a free tote.
EW read and revised various drafts of the manuscript.
ME read and revised various drafts of the manuscript.
LIS and JSS conceived of the study, participated in its design, and revised various versions of the manuscript.
BL and SM wrote the initial draft of the manuscript, and revised various drafts to produce the completed draft.
All authors have extensively revised various versions of the paper and approved its final version prior to submission.
HRE conceived of the study and made substantial contribution to the conception and design of the study, the interpretation of data, and revised various versions of the manuscript.
They are revised by various experts according to various kinds of data requirements.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com