Sentence examples for various antimicrobial agents from inspiring English sources

Dimedone has been utilized successfully as pharmacophoric building block in various antimicrobial agents such as xanthenes [14, 15], substituted chromenes [16], macrocyclic metal complexes [17], quinazoline derivatives [18], tetrahydro quinolone diones [19] and acridine based compounds [20].

It is a matter of concern when MRSA and some specific lineages of S. aureus are taken as commensal habitants of the skin and nose of wild animals and are characterized with resistance to various antimicrobial agents in clinical use.

We examined the adherence characteristics and susceptibility to various antimicrobial agents of 130 strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from infective skin lesions and 135 strains of S. aureus isolated from non-infective eczematous lesions of atopic dermatitis (AD) patients.

Traditionally, the determination of antimicrobial susceptibility to antibiotics is facilitated after isolation of the microorganism and examination of its growth in media containing various antimicrobial agents, in a process that can take up to 48 hours [4], [5].

Various antimicrobial agents are used for both intact skin and wounds, although concerns are raised based upon effects on human cells and wound healing, such as those observed for silver [34], [72].

We used Biolog® Phenotype Microarrays (PM) to screen 1900 different growth conditions, including a large set of different carbon and nitrogen sources, pH values and salt concentrations, as well as different concentrations of various antimicrobial agents (Fig. S1), and found that both WT and AP GAS have similar growth requirements in vitro with minor differences.

Susceptibility to several antimicrobial agents representative of various classes (ampicillin, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, kanamycin, gentamicin, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin) was tested in 1,405 (8%) E. coli isolates randomly selected from the 18,042 collected samples.

Various natural antimicrobial agents that have the potential for food processing and preservation are effective against Gram positive foodborne bacteria, but they are very less effective and sometimes not effective against the Gram negative foodborne bacteria (Trombetta et al. [2005]; Bassole and Juliani [2012]; Sfeir et al. [2013]; Nazzaro et al. [2013]).

The purpose of this study was to evaluate various oral antimicrobial agent levels in tooth extraction sites.

Table 1 mentions the various concentrations of antimicrobial agents studied.

The growth of Ureaplasma species and M. hominis at various breakpoints of antimicrobial agents are displayed in Table  1.