Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(10)
Of course, there are thousands of wild yeast strains, but, save for their use by a few Belgian brewers to make "Lambic" beers, they tend to be ignored (mainly because of their ability to cause infections), while around 24 laboratory-grown varieties are considered useful for brewers.
In [12], only the AM-AM varieties are considered to affect the beamforming, regardless of the AM-PM varieties and memory effects.
Rather, a large number of crop varieties are considered safe and nutritious.
In viticulture, grapevine varieties are considered to consist of clones that share common morphological traits.
These intervals should conservatively capture the safe levels of these compositional components in the seeds of these crops, since 100% of commercial corn, cotton, and soybean varieties are considered compositionally safe.
The changes giving rise to these independently named varieties are considered to be genetic mutations, although without the possibility of carrying out genetic segregation tests and without cloning and sequencing the relevant genes this is not proven and they may be epigenetic variants.
Similar(50)
In the Structure analysis these varieties were considered as admixed.
Therefore, utilization of BPH resistance genes in developing resistant varieties is considered as the most economical and eco-friendly approach to control this pest (Tanaka et al. 2000).
Hence, utilization of resistance genes in resistant varieties is considered as a more economical and eco-friendly effective method for control.
The potential for gene flow (cross contamination between transgenic and non-transgenic varieties) was considered a possible outcome of the unrestricted regulation of Roundup Ready Alfalfa (RRA), and potentially, a catastrophic environmental threat to non-transgenic alfalfa seed growers.
Breeding and deployment of resistant varieties is considered as the most effective strategy to control this disease.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com