Exact(60)
The variation coefficients were below 10%.
The intra- and inter-assay variation coefficients were equal to or below 4.7and6.1%%, respectively.
Figure 6 shows a list of variation coefficients for all local feature regions.
The average final weight and total length variation coefficients were 18 and 6.8 % respectively.
The inter- and intra-day variation coefficients were less than 5%%.
Obviously, using features with the weight coefficient resulted in small variation coefficients.
Moment ratio had the highest precision, as calculated by the variation coefficients.
The mean variation coefficients, as a measure of repeatability, are also presented (Table 3).
Final weight and total length variation coefficients were not significantly different (p > 0.05).
So far, we have used the Gamma distribution shown in Fig. 1, which is relatively symmetric for small variation coefficients.
The variation coefficients were under 10% and detection limits (mg/L) were determined by the calibration curve method.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com