Sentence examples for variation as determined from inspiring English sources

These percentages represent the overall magnitude of the different sources of variation as determined by ANOVA analyses.

Stiasny et al. measured total E-specific IgG titers from six DENV-2 infected patient sera that ranged from 104 to 106 [19]; similar magnitudes and variation as determined in this study.

Interassay variation as determined using a control sample included in each assay was 20.1% (coefficient of variation).

Analysis of 36 tumour biopsies showed that GBMs display heterogeneous profiles based on DNA content and corresponding copy number variation as determined by FS-array CGH (Fig.  1a, b; supplementary Table 1).

Similarly, the mean CV for inter-assay variation, as determined from plate-to-plate or batch-to-batch variations ranged from 9 to 11%, and 2.8 to 5.6%, respectively.

Experimental groups formed clearly differentiated clusters with low inter-replicate variation as determined by both hierarchical clustering (Fig. 1A) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) (Fig. 1A) of statistically significant expression ratios.

Both the main field declination D and the horizontal component H were scaled up by a factor of 2 in order to match the scale of the bar chart, while the secular variation for D was scaled by 4 Fig. 3 Contour plot of the misfit of IGRF-12 to Southern African declination (D) observations after subtracting crustal anomalies (MF7) and external field variations as determined by the CM4 model.

Parameters were set for the general model of DNA substitution [general time reversible (GTR); nst = 6] with different rate variations (as determine by hLRT and AIC), and otherwise flat priors.

Cell line and virus concentration were evaluated as potential covariates but did not explain additional variation among titers as determined by increases in DIC values (data not shown).

However, batch-to-batch differences are considered to be minor: the coefficient of variation (inter-assay) as determined with two kit control samples was minimal (5.9% at the level of 20.3 nmol/L and 5.4% at the level of 77.4 nmol/l), no significant between-day drift, time shifts, or other trends were observed and the percentage of variance attributable to batch-to-batch differences was 4.5%.

These cases also reflect, albeit to very different degrees, variation in occupation intensity as determined from sediment and artifact accumulation rates.