Sentence examples for variance in structure from inspiring English sources

These loadings indicate to what extent variance in brain size explains variance in structure volume.

Thus, overall changes in brain size explain about 86% of the variance in structure volume.

Two lines of evidence strongly suggest PC1 describes variance in structure volume resulting from differences in brain size.

Although the variance in structure volume explained by changes in whole brain size is much lower than in mammals, it still represents 86% of all variance in volume.

The first component (PC1) in the multivariate principal component analysis explained 86% of the total variance in structure volume, the second component (PC2) explained 7% of the variance, or about 50% of the variance not explained by brain size.

While in cichlids differences in brain size accounted for 86% of the variance in structure volume, even when accounting for non-independence of data due to species relatedness, in mammals brain size differences account for 96% of the variance, although in mammals the analysis did not account for phylogenetic effects [ 13].

Although we were unable to find a relationship between the two variables, this analysis demonstrates the amount of variance in the structure of Costa Rican forests (Figure 6A). Figure 6 The relationship between the components of forest structure for trees of different sizes.

Elevation gradient, used as a proxy for regional-scale effects in the study regions, explained more than 60% of variance in assemblage structure.

Our conclusion is that current abiotic soil factors, but not past events due to the historical connection of the forests, account for the variance in the structure of these soil bacterial communities.

My study provides rare comparative evidence illustrating how the sensory system of receivers sets the minimum requirements for what constitutes an effective signal, given the transmission distance of signals, with further variance in signal structure resulting from the environmental conditions occurring at the time of communication.

The remaining three factors explained far less variance in the structure of predatory fish communities.