The regularity/predictability of users' mobility patterns, the percentage of journeys not coverable because of range issues, and users' individual comfortable range accounted for variance in range satisfaction.
This pattern was not explained by body size: both large- and small-bodied species had broad and restricted ranges (figure 2 a), and neither body size estimate explained a significant proportion of interspecific variance in range size (table 2; electronic supplementary material).
The predictions agreed well with the experimental values with a satisfactory correlation coefficient in the range of 0.9249 0.9988, the absolute fraction of variance in the range of 0.8753 0.9976, and the mean relative error in the range of 0.0008 0.54%, moreover, the root mean square error values for the ANN training and predictions were very low relative to the range of the experiments.
There was clinical variance in the range of follow-up periods that were used by the investigators measuring re-hospitalization (follow up periods ranged from 27 days to 6 month, see Table 1) as well as the investigators used varying definitions of the term in-hospital complications (included in-hospital complications were cardiac events, infections, thrombosis, re-operation, sepsis and empyema).
And consequently, the waveform variance in this range is supposed to be much distinctive.
Hence, we try many experiments with the input variance in the range of [10,70] and choose the best one for each of the algorithms.
These variables accounted for 44% of the variance in FRT range of motion [F 2,59) = 24.5, P < 0.001], with neck movement or positions provoke headache as the most significant predictor accounting for 41% of the variance.
Due to this difference in the energy distribution ratio, the physical range of damage fragments through the sensitive microvolume of the detector will also be different, because inelastic reactions result in a much greater variance in the range of fragments in the silicon, compared to elastic damage which is uniformly distributed throughout.
We utilize a multiscale mixed effects modelling framework to examine how seasonal fluctuations in climate, food resource abundance and group mass affect variance in home range area and the maturity stage of forest used by a group-living Neotropical primate, the white-faced capuchin, Cebus capucinus.
Multivariate regression analysis revealed that 44% of the variance in FRT range of motion was explained by the presence of two variables: neck movement or positions provoke headache, and neck symptoms precede headache, but not by other factors associated with migraine.
In contrast, nearly all of the background corrected methods (bg_*) result in high and, compared to the other methods, instable variance in the range of low intensity values.
