variance in communication

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "variance in communication" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe differences or variations in the way people communicate, whether in style, tone, or method. Example: "The variance in communication among team members can lead to misunderstandings if not addressed."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

Among the investigated group of doctors only a small proportion of variance in communication skills performance was accounted for by adding year of qualification into the regression model (7%).

BMC Medical Education

Salisbury and colleagues noted that a high proportion of the variance in communication scores in English general practice is attributable to patients and other factors, rather than to practices or individual doctors.

British Medical Journal

Results After control for differences in patients' age, sex, ethnicity, and health status, the proportion of variance in communication scores that was due to differences between doctors (6.4%) was considerably more than that due to practices (1.8%).

British Medical Journal

31 Our results suggest that despite the high proportion of patient level variance in communication scores, for this survey instrument a reliable (>0.8) adjusted mean score for individual doctors can be obtained with 46 patient scores per general practitioner, so that only a small minority of variance in reported doctor level scores is attributable to patients and residual sources.

British Medical Journal

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Only 6.3% (3.8% to 8.9%) of the variance in the doctors' communication skills measure was due to differences between doctors; 92.4% (88.5% to 96.4%) of the variance occurred at the level of the patient (including differences between patients' perceptions and random variation).

British Medical Journal

The factor analysis of all the instruments together yielded a two-factor solution accounting for 67% of the total variance in the scores of communication skills (Table 5).

BMC Medical Education

In the third model feeding method was added and the variance explained was 72.5%, F (5, 65) = 34.345, p < .001, accounting for an additional 0.8% of the variance in total satisfaction, after controlling for communication ratings and HADS depression sub-type, R squared change = .008, F change (1, 65) =1.833, p > .05.05

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Agreeableness, emotional stability and conscientiousness were added at the final model and the overall variance explained was 74%, F (8, 62) =22.048, p < .001, accounting for an additional 1.4% of the variance in total satisfaction, after controlling for communication ratings, HADS depression sub-type and feeding method, R squared change = .014, F change (3, 62) =1.152, p > .05.05

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Both sides admit a breakdown in communication.

The New York Times

So we were all in communication.

The New Yorker

This can mean differences in communication style.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing group dynamics, clarify the specific context in which "variance in communication" occurs to avoid ambiguity. For instance, specify whether you're referring to differences in verbal style, non-verbal cues, or channel preference.

Common error

Avoid attributing "variance in communication" solely to individual differences without considering situational factors, cultural backgrounds, or the specific communication channel used. Failure to consider these variables can lead to inaccurate assessments and ineffective interventions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "variance in communication" functions as a noun phrase that describes the degree of dissimilarity or difference present in communicative interactions. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

30%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "variance in communication" is grammatically sound and used to describe the extent of differences present in communication styles or methods. Ludwig AI validates that the phrase is correct and usable in written English. While not exceedingly common, it finds use across scientific, news, and general contexts. Understanding this "variance" is crucial for effective communication, especially in diverse or professional settings. The key is to acknowledge and address these differences proactively to prevent misunderstandings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

differences in communication styles

Focuses specifically on the stylistic variations in how individuals or groups communicate.

variations in communication methods

Highlights the different approaches or techniques used in communication.

diversity in communication approaches

Emphasizes the range and variety of communication strategies.

disparities in communication effectiveness

Addresses the differences in how well communication achieves its intended outcome.

fluctuations in communication quality

Indicates changes or inconsistency in the standard of communication.

deviations in communication norms

Refers to instances where communication diverges from established or expected patterns.

inconsistencies in communication practices

Points out the lack of uniformity or predictability in how communication is carried out.

divergences in communication patterns

Highlights the different paths or directions that communication can take.

range of communication strategies

Focuses on the spectrum of different strategies used for communicating.

spectrum of communication techniques

Similar to the previous, but emphasizes the array of techniques used.

FAQs

How can "variance in communication" affect teamwork?

Significant "variance in communication" can lead to misunderstandings, decreased efficiency, and conflict within teams. Addressing these differences through training or establishing clear communication protocols is essential for team success.

What factors contribute to "variance in communication" in a multicultural setting?

Cultural backgrounds, language proficiency, and differing communication norms can all contribute to "variance in communication" in multicultural settings. Awareness and adaptation are key to effective intercultural communication.

What strategies can reduce negative effects of "variance in communication"?

Strategies include active listening, clarifying expectations, providing feedback, and using communication tools that minimize ambiguity. Training in intercultural communication and conflict resolution can also be beneficial.

What's the difference between "variance in communication" and "communication breakdown"?

"Variance in communication" refers to the range of differences in how people communicate. "Communication breakdown" implies a failure in the communication process, often stemming from unaddressed variances.