Results: MacArthur battery scores improved in intervention compared with home control at 3, 6, and 12 months (repeated-measures analysis of variance: group × time, P<.05) but not 18 months.
Seven subjects were first exposed to the large variance (group 2A), and seven subjects were first exposed to the small variance (group 2B, see Fig. 4).
Similarly, for subjects exposed to the small variance (group 1B, N = 7), cue and target coins appeared in a relatively narrow region of the screen.
For subjects exposed to the large variance (group 1A, N = 7), cue and target coins appeared over relatively broad regions of the screen.
In contrast, data with repeated records per individual will have one variance group per animal rather than one per family.
The data were analysed by three-factor analysis of variance (group × phase × ratio), with repeated measures on the second and third factors.
Repeated-measure analysis of variance (group × time) was performed to assess the effects of intervention on cognitive function and physical performance.
These data were analysed by three-factor analyses of variance (group × phase × ratio), with repeated measures on the second and third factors.
The effects of the three interventions will be evaluated using repeated-measures analysis of variance (group[ 3] × time[ 2]) with the outcome measures as the dependent variable.
This increase was significantly more important in the Low than in the High variance group (Difference: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.26 1.25 cells/mms/mm per month).
However, not all behaviors accord perfectly with this simplification across risk groups; the behavior of individuals in the moderate variance (i.e. 100/300 Naira) group sometimes aligned more with the no variance group (i.e. 200/200 Naira) and sometimes aligned more closely with those in the highest variance group (i.e. 0/400 Naira).
