Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(15)
A QTL qDTH6, associated with DTH, was identified near markers RM539 and RM527 on chromosome 6 for seven consecutive years, explaining from 42 to 78% of the total phenotypic variance (data not shown).
Results of the principal components analysis (PCA) of the initial 15,336 gene-set resulting from "Present Calls" (MAS 5.0) on the HG-U133 A chip from control subjects and cocaine abusers, demonstrated that the first three components accounted for 35.2% of the total variance (data not shown).
The QTL × environment interaction variances, however, were in all cases smaller than QTL variance (data not shown).
Var epooling-2) estimates followed the same pattern, larger estimates of pooling Var epooling-2ool-construction variancestimatesot shown).
Both discriminant functions were highly significant (P < 0.0001) and the percentage of variation accounted for by the first discriminant function was 63.6% of the variance (data not shown).
Detection of the Spir1 locus on chromosome 7 was replicated in this study, also accounting for ~ 8% of the phenotypic variance (data not shown).
Similar(45)
Means of study outcomes by tertiles of prenatal PFAAs concentrations exhibited equal variances (data not shown).
With respect to this likely trend, the variance in quantitative traits was generally greater on the site with harsher climatic variation (data not shown).
The first axis (Eigen vector) displayed 11.96% of the variance, while the second axis (Eigen vector) and the third axis (Eigen vector) showed 9.41% and 7.85% of the variance respectively (data not shown).
RNA integrity was not significantly different between groups by one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (data not shown).
One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (data not shown) indicated that xylan and acid insoluble lignin (AIL) were the only components that were significantly different among the various bagasse samples, at a significance level of 0.05 (P-values of 0.009 and 0.003 for the xylan and AIL, respectively).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com