Note that R is not included for the adjusted models, since our focus is on the variance explained by the pre-admission measures, not the additional variance explained by gender, age, ethnicity and deprivation.
The proportion of the variance explained by gender was significant in HF and LF/HF ratio models while HDL explained a significant proportion of the variance in VLF, rMSSD and pNN50 models.
The comparatively greatest fractions of the variance explained by gender were seen for blunt pressure and electric stimuli.
Loomingness, however, did not account for a significant amount of variance in fear, for any animal, beyond the variance accounted for by gender, negative evaluation, and the vulnerability-related variables.
We found lower PACIC scores in females, while the bulk of studies report non-significant relationships [ 8, 11, 12, 15], although that may reflect the higher level of power in the current analysis as the proportion of variance accounted for by gender was trivial.
Fifty-six per cent of the variance for AIxao was explained by gender, height, HR and SBP.
The variable with the largest contribution to explained variance was SOC (6.7%), followed by gender (3.9%) and status of being IDPs or non-IDPs (2.8%).
A large part of the variance in aerobic capacity is explained by gender and ambulatory status.
A series of group by gender analyses of variance were conducted to evaluate the differences in postural control for all TTB variables separately with eyes open and eyes closed.
Nineteen percent of variance in psychological stress was accounted for by gender, age, education, and depression.
