Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
The Kruskal Wallis test was used for continuous variable assessments between clinicopathologic factors and the immunohistochemical biomarker.
Reaction time has been a popular variable for assessment of impaired behavioral task performance for several reasons, including ease of measurement, adversity of effect, and sensitivity to drugs and toxic chemicals.
Together, these results strengthen the hypothesis that individual movement patterns might be used as an adjunct to basic symptom ratings (e.g., self- or observer-reported mood) and provide a new biological variable for assessment of BD.
Due to the large number of possible dependent variables (8 in total: assessment and intervention for each risk factor) preliminary analysis was undertaken to determine whether it would be possible to create one outcome variable for assessment and one outcome variable reflecting intervention practices.
We used self-report assessments for all variables, and the relationships could be affected by a common measurement bias.
Intraclass correlations were consistent with these assessments for all variables.
Assessing the relationship of change in symptoms of pain and function between preoperative and postoperative assessments for predictor variables in the final model revealed that patients achieved large symptomatic improvement (change), regardless of differences in preoperative patient and surgical factors.
Similar results were observed when the assessments for the two variables were compared between visits.
This new environmental change variable is often left out of risk assessments for all manner of new infrastructure builds.
In the latter, age-relative activity was the independent variable, and assessments were adjusted for actual age.
Histogram bandwidth and phase SD showed the best correlation with Ts-SD assessed with tri-plane TDI and appeared the most optimal variables for assessment of LV dyssynchrony with GMPS.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com