The variability in the results indicate that other landscape variables, such as the influence of understory Rhododendron species, may exert more control on stream conditions than canopy composition.
Yet, possibly due to the relatively small expression changes and the greater variability in the results obtained using a real-time PCR, these differences reached statistical significance only for some of the groups and some of the genes studied.
If not, multistage triaxial test procedure is used to eliminate the effects of soil variability in the results.
However, there is considerable intra- and inter-laboratory variability in the results, which impact comparability and clinical practice.
The variability in the results due to the differences in identification methods and excitation conditions is examined.
The central design concept reduces variability in the results by clearly specifying calculations and providing default values based on historical data.
This study was designed to resolve uncertainty concerning whether the position of the examiner is associated with variability in the results of the nearpoint alternate cover test (NACT).
However, inter-laboratory application of this method for the analysis of TPH in the soil has often shown considerable variability in the results.
Glass stability was not as clearly defined due to variability in the results; however, contributions of interactions between CPAs to the glass stability of solutions were determined.
The chapter also introduces interaction effects, an important and often overlooked source of variability in the results in the real world.
The variability in the results is explained by the assumptions made by the person undertaking the validation without the involvement of the machine designer.
