Sentence examples for variability in the ratings from inspiring English sources

The intraclass correlation (ICC) we report is the variability of the true quality rating divided by the total variability in the ratings (or the sum of all three sources of variability).

The value of σ is a measure of the underlying variability in the ratings.

There was significant variability in the ratings of the relative importance of all adverse events, except those that were mild and easily reversible.

There was high variability in the ratings for areas of satisfaction and motivation across the different practice settings, but there were also commonalities.

This term represents both the variability in the ratings due to the interaction of participants, scenarios and sections and any variability that was unaccounted for in the design.

As noted by the ranges in Table  1 and the histograms illustrating the distributions of the mean relative importance of each adverse event, there was significant variability in the ratings of all adverse events, except those that were felt to be the least important.

In general, despite inter-speaker variability in the self-ratings, it is safe to assume that all speakers had an above-average Min proficiency level, as none of the speakers self-rated him-/herself as lower than 4, and all except for one self-rated themselves as 5 or above.

Despite inter-speaker variability in the self-ratings, it is safe to assume that all speakers had an above-average proficiency level in Min, as none of the speakers self-rated herself as lower than 4, and most speakers self-rated themselves as 5 or above.

The high variability in ratings at the first scoring round was primarily due to differences in interpretation of the criteria described in the PRECIS tool and of how the design elements of the study fitted these dimensions.

Multidimensional scaling revealed two dimensions, aversive textural properties of the foods and reminders of livingness/animalness, that accounted for most of the variability in ratings of perceived disgustingness of the foods depicted in the scenarios.

A more general explanation for the observed variability in child ratings by close acquaintances or strangers can be provided by researchers and theorists in the domains of social and personality psychology.