Sentence examples for variability in the force from inspiring English sources

In evaluating the Bland and Altman precision or measurement error in FL and CT from the ten responses of each participant, we found that a single measurement could differ from a participant's true value by almost 30 ms. This may be due to the known variability in the force of the patellar tendon reflex response [ 23].

Our results lend support to the importance of spatial heterogeneity in the rules of landscape change, and suggest that models that attend local variability in the forces driving landscape change can provide more useful predictions than models that assume these forces operate similarly throughout the landscape.

Although there is interoperator variability in the forces exerted, typically around 11 N are applied and considered safe in manual traction procedures.

The surprising result is that the library variants showed a considerable variability in the high-force and low-force rates, actually spanning the range defined by the quite different catalysis patterns of thioredoxins from bacterial and eukaryotic origin.

Increased variability in the tangential force composition was found during pain compared with the non-painful condition (P < .05).05

These path discrepancies produced variability in the resultant force at the knee of 44 ± 24 and 21 ± 8 N, respectively, for Manipulators 1 and 2 primarily due to contact between the articular surfaces of the tibia and femur.

The corresponding variability in the resultant force at the knee for these assigned positions was 32 ± 33 N for Manipulator 1 and 4 ± 1 N for Manipulator 2. Furthermore, the repeatability of the trajectory of each manipulator while moving between assigned positions (path repeatability) was 0.8 mm for Manipulator 1 while the path repeatability for Manipulator 2 was improved (0.1 mm).

Therefore, improved position and path repeatability yields lower variability in the resultant forces at the knee.

Particular emphasis is placed on the evaluation of local and spatial variability in the disruptive forces, and the local time and space scales of interest.

Although position repeatability has been the most common criteria for evaluating biomechanical testing devices, the current study has clearly demonstrated that path repeatability can have an even larger effect on the variability in resultant force at the knee.

The results suggest that there is significant inter/intra-aircraft variability in the amount of force required to jettison the push-out window.