Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
Results: A total of 559 values were evaluated.
Ne values were evaluated through specific software and θ estimator.
All other significance values were evaluated using independent samples t tests.
Differences between values were evaluated using a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.
Based on the LHEF rating scheme, the TEHD values were evaluated for all the five facets.
To identify the mechanism of the adsorption process, the adsorption isotherm values were evaluated and analyzed.
The correlations between PET imaging and ex vivo measurement values were evaluated using linear regression analysis.
Primary roughness values were evaluated by an atomic force microscope (AFM).
Their diagnostic values were evaluated by two methods of indirect ELISA and dot blot analysis.
Resolution, runtime and migration time relative standard deviation values were evaluated.
The values were evaluated and tested using different techniques, such as curve fitting, nonlinear regression, and the square method.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com