Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
The critical values of this statistic are required for the Scheffé-type monotone contrast procedure.
Significance of observed values of this statistic relative to the expectation of zero was assessed by permutation tests.
Larger values of this statistic imply a greater level of association between the TF and miRNA.
Result of DIF analysis is presented in Table 2, and revealed that none of the eight items showed DIF according to participants' group condition.> -wrap-foot> Critical values of this statistic are 3.84 for a Type I error rate of 0.05.
Significance of this statistic could be obtained by calculating many possible values of this statistic using sample permutations: (6) where and denotes the mean and standard deviation of the gene scores over all genes calculated for the ith permutation of samples.
Similar(55)
In the calibration process, the reduction in the RMSE value was particularly evident with the generalized mixed models for the other broadleaf species and other conifer species (21.0% and 13.0% respectively) compared with the generalized model fitted without random parameters; however, for the Pinus and Quercus groupings, the decrease in the value of this statistic was lower.
A value of this statistic <20 is considered good calibration.
The large absolute value of this statistic is in favor of rejecting null hypothesis.
When genes within a group are highly coexpressed, the value of this statistic will be high and when they are not it will be very low.
The numerical value of this statistic is then compared to the distribution of that statistic's value under a null spatial model, providing a probabilistic assessment of how unlikely an observed cluster statistic is under the null hypothesis [ 15].
10, 11 The −2 log likelihood (which is the parameter in the Cox regression) of the 6th edition was compared to that of the 7th edition; the smaller the value of this statistic, the better the model.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com