Sentence examples for values of the discrepancy from inspiring English sources

Equally, the values of the discrepancy were specified as group average values of these percentages.

Considering only these regions and carrying out proportion tests between pairs of variables, we found that all the higher values of the discrepancy curve are significant (p < 0.0001).

The hallux angle (numeric values of the angle) and the lengthwise fit of the shoes (numeric values of the discrepancy between length of shoes and length of foot) show a clear relationship (r indoor shoes) = -0.10, n = 763, p < 0.003; r outdoor shoes) = -0.10, n = 767, p < 0.007): The shorter the shoe, the greater the hallux valgus angle.

This model is then estimated, and the χ2 value of the discrepancy function is calculated.

The value of the discrepancy function multiplied by N - 1 is usually referred to as the χ2 test of the model.

Using the distortion theorem (eq 35) one can predict that: The degree to which the structure as a whole is strained is measured by the global instability index, G, which is the root-mean-square value of the discrepancy factors averaged over the N atoms of the formula unit: In stable, well determined structures G is usually less than 0.1 vu.

For a urban network with a set N of links, possible aggregations are the mean value of the discrepancies over all the links, e.g. the mean value Open image in new window, or the square mean value Open image in new window, or any other aggregated representative of all data discrepancies.

We reported in Table9 (respectively Table10) the values of the relative discrepancy δ E between the projected and non-projected energies, as a function of (N-Z), for Z = 6 and Z = 8 when G np  = 0.75 G pp (respectively when G np  = 1.5 G pp ) in order to illustrate the region G np  < (G np ) c (respectively G np  > (G np ) c ).

We reported in Table 9 (respectively, Table 10) the values of the relative discrepancy δE between the projected and non-projected energies, as a function of (N − Z), for Z = 6 and Z = 8 when G np  = 0.75 G pp (respectively, when G np  = 1.5 G pp ) to illustrate the region G n p < G n p c (respectively, G n p > G n p c ).

As seen from the p values, the likelihood of the discrepancy in medulloblastoma/PNET survival to be a result of mere statistical chance is in the range between 1.5 and 4.5%.

[ 19] The chi-square statistic for CSA models is defined as the optimum value of the above discrepancy function F multiplied by sample size minus one.