Sentence examples for values of the ceiling from inspiring English sources

The CEAC shows the probability of the intervention being cost-effective for all potential values of the ceiling ratio.

Cost-utility acceptability curves are presented by plotting these probabilities for a range of possible values of the ceiling ratio [ 57].

Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves are presented by plotting these probabilities for a range of possible values of the ceiling ratio [ 21].

Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEAC) were generated by plotting these probabilities for a range of possible values of the ceiling ratio [ 30, 31].

Cost Effectiveness Acceptability Curves (CEAC's), measured the probability that the CE ratio-resulting from a trial was acceptable in relation to different values of the ceiling ratio (from 0 to ∞).

Lastly, while the main concern of this paper is with methodological challenges, the high values of the ceiling ratios that we found for the CHBI scheme to be cost-effective are of interest.

From the distributions of cost and effectiveness differences the probability that one setting is cost-effective compared to another is calculated depending on a range of values for the ceiling ratio λ and presented in the form of a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve [ 21, 22].

The first is to reduce the value of f (t)·g (t) and the second is to increase the value of the ceiling κ.

In addition, net monetary benefit (NMB) was calculated to determine the intervention which gave the maximum expected NMB for each value of the ceiling ratio (i.e., the value of society's willingness to pay (WTP) for an intervention giving one QALY gained).

Identifying what intervention is cost-effective compared to an alternative is an important piece of information, and we have now seen that even if one does not know the true value of the ceiling ratio, using a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve it is possible to show the level of uncertainty surrounding the estimated ICER.

Mainly due to lower indirect costs this analysis showed a decrease of the difference in total costs between the intervention groups from €612 to €121, whereby the cost-effectiveness ratio for perceived recovery decreased from €19,773 to €2,876, and the value of the ceiling ratio of 50%-probability that AMT is cost effective to recover one patient after 26 weeks decreased from €20,000 to €2,800.