Sentence examples for values for persons from inspiring English sources
This probability ranges from 1 in the case of persons within the same household to very low values for persons who visit the same shopping center.
With bootstrap re-sampling, we could create a more robust, precise and valid sampling of the range of values for persons not in remission.
There is currently a paucity of data describing relative health utility values for persons with chronic stable angina reporting the abovementioned frequencies of angina attacks.
For the outcome variables of interest, depression, cognitive functioning, and fatigue, baseline values for persons available for analyses were similar compared to those lost to follow-up (see Additional file 1: Table S1).
The mean values and 95% confidence intervals for the neurographic variables were calculated for the right hands and the values for persons diagnosed with clinically certain CTS were compared with those for two groups (asymptomatic controls only and asymptomatic controls combined with the symptomatic persons diagnosed with clinically uncertain CTS).
Wright Maps (also known as person-tem maps) were constructed using logit values for person measures and items (Wilson and Draney 2000).
The minimum values for person ability exceeded the minimum values for item difficulty, indicating that some items were excessively easy, namely items FN1LC, FN2LC, FN7IC, BE1LC and KS3LC.
The minimum values for person ability exceeded the minimum values for item difficulty, indicating that some items were excessively easy, such as the following items: FN1LC, FN2LC, FN7IC, BE1LC, KS1R, KS3LC.
The model mathematically predicts that goals that require moderate effort to achieve will have the greatest value for persons highly motivated for success.
A mean ability value for persons who chose each option relative to each item was also calculated.
The analysis of the mean ability value for persons who chose each option relative to each item confirmed the presence of unexpected responses in some items, where lower ability persons succeeded in responding to higher item difficulty items and higher ability level persons failed to answer to lower item difficulty questions.
