Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
A well-known result from theory says that the order of convergence of the whole integration is q + 1, if all those starting values are accurate of that same order.
Even if predicted path loss values are accurate enough like, for example, in [1], time dispersion parameters could show a significant mismatch.
Nash Sutcliffe efficiency (ENS) values lies between −∞ and 1. ENS values, 1 indicates that the perfect match, whereas 0 value indicates that simulated values are accurate as mean of the observed values.
Reported Em values are accurate within ca. ±10 mV.
In addition, we believe the predicted values are accurate estimates of PM2.5 and NOx concentrations.
Assuming externally reported values are accurate and the model assumptions are reasonable, lower than expected concentration estimates would suggest a tendency to over report exposures, while higher than expected concentrations would suggest underreporting.
Similar(54)
Values were accurate to ± 0.1°C.
Values were accurate to ± 2% of relative humidity.
At 500 and 525 °C, the nC+ currents were reliable and Fm values were accurate and precise.
We tested each instrument against a gas standard, and values were accurate within 2.8% of actual values.
Because Kohn et al. used animal excretion data for some of the metabolites, they estimated that their FE values were accurate to approximately 50%, whereas the FU values could vary by 15-fold among species with humans in the middle.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com