valued to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "valued to" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is unclear in what context it could be used, as it does not fit standard grammatical structures. Example: "The project was valued to be worth millions" does not make sense.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But the deal still appeared richly valued to some analysts.

The New York Times

It was valued to be less than $1 just66 months ago.

Stanford University

According to the auction program, the house was "previously valued" to $457,000.

The New York Times

The elderly, he added, should be "cherished and valued to the end of their days".

The Guardian

4) Stock is more than fairly valued to peers such as SuperGroup.

The Guardian - Business

This could easily more than double, if just their preference shares are valued, to £6.3m.

The Guardian

Private policing and citizen involvement are not valued to the extent they are in the Anglo-American tradition.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

"Important people do need to feel valued to do their job to the best of their ability," he said.

The Guardian

These results indicated that LMX-loaded liposomes were valued to develop as a practical preparation for oral or i.v. administration.

International Journal of Pharmaceutics

"Currently the Tutoring market is valued to over $150bn per year and is expanding by almost $8bn per year.

MIT Technology Review

He says the allegations have no merit.Steinway Musical Instruments agreed to be bought by Kohlberg & Company in a private-equity deal valued to the tune of $438m.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "valued to" in your writing. Instead, use "valued at" or other similar alternatives to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity.

Common error

Many writers mistakenly use "valued to" when they mean "valued at". "Valued at" is the correct phrase to use when indicating the assessed worth or price of something. For example, "The painting was valued at $1 million" is correct, while "The painting was valued to $1 million" is incorrect.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "valued to" functions incorrectly as a prepositional phrase, attempting to link a subject with an estimated or appraised value. However, as indicated by Ludwig AI, the phrase is not grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Science

32%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

9%

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "valued to" is frequently used but grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI points out, this phrase does not conform to standard English grammar. While it appears in various contexts, including news, science, and academic writing, its incorrectness impacts its credibility and clarity. To avoid this error, use alternatives such as ""valued at"", "assessed at", or "estimated at". Remember to always double-check your grammar and consider using a grammar checker to ensure accuracy and professionalism in your writing. Avoid using the phrase "valued to" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

valued at

Focuses on the specific monetary or quantitative assessment of something.

assessed at

Similar to valued at, but often implies a more formal or official evaluation.

estimated at

Emphasizes that the value is approximate, based on available information.

deemed worthy of

Shifts the focus from numerical value to the qualitative aspect of being considered important or worthwhile.

considered important for

Highlights the significance or relevance of something for a particular purpose.

seen as crucial for

Indicates that something is essential or vital for achieving a specific outcome.

recognized as beneficial for

Emphasizes the positive effects or advantages that something provides.

regarded as significant for

Similar to 'considered important', but often carries a more formal tone.

evaluated for

Focuses on the process of assessing something's value or worth.

priced at

Specifically refers to the cost or selling price of an item or service.

FAQs

What is the correct way to express the assessed worth of something?

Use "valued at" to indicate the estimated or appraised worth. For example, "The antique car was "valued at" $50,000" is grammatically correct.

What are some alternatives to "valued at"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "assessed at", "estimated at", or "appraised at" as alternatives to ""valued at"".

Is "valued to" ever grammatically correct?

No, "valued to" is not a standard or grammatically accepted phrase in English. It's best to avoid using it in your writing.

How can I avoid making mistakes when expressing value or worth?

Double-check your phrase choices and consider using a grammar checker or style guide to ensure accuracy. Opt for established phrases like ""valued at"", "worth", or "estimated to be".