Sentence examples for value for subject from inspiring English sources

Let Yi denote the quantitative trait value for subject i (i = 1,..,n), and Xij denote the genotype of subject i at SNP j (j = 1,..,k).

For subjects i = 1,…, n, let t i represent the immunological assay value for subject i (typically immunological assay values are log-transformed before making calculations).

*The p value for subject characteristics is based on the chi-square test for trend, and the p value for sports facilities per 1,0000 population is based on linear regression.

In model 1, α0 is the logarithm of the baseline rate for the event, μ i is the unobserved frailty for subject i, x i is a covariate value for subject i, β is the regression coefficient, and t represents the time from start of observation.

This method resembles the Model using mean exposure across visits as a summary, except now we regress the binary variable on the maximum, rather than the average, of the continuous variable: where and is defined as the vector of covariates at the visit of which the continuous variable assumes its maximum value for subject i.

Let Ti = min(Zi,Ci) be the observed time, where Zi is the time to event (development of disease) and Ci the right censoring time, δi the censoring indicator (δi = 1 if Ti = Zi and δi = 0 if Ti = Ci) and Xi the biomarker value for subject i. Independence completely at random between Z and C is assumed as in the classical framework of survival analysis.

For individuals who were judged to look younger than their chronological age this figure had a negative value; for subjects judged to look older than their chronological age this value had a positive value.

The average physical activity level value for subjects with a body mass index higher than 40 kg/m, i.e., for subjects with morbid obesity, was 1.65 ± 0.24.

Comparing each subject's plasma cotinine values with their self-reported tobacco use status revealed overall consistent results (i.e. a high cotinine value for subjects who self-reported that they were active tobacco users).

As biopsies often have no value for subjects in terms of clinical management, their ethical justification rests on an expectation that their performance will be redeemed by the value of the knowledge accrued (Olson et al, 2011).

The corresponding value for subjects with mean exposure greater than 20 V m−1, however, was 1.03 (0.44–2.40), and the results overall show little evidence of increasing risk with increasing dose.