validly named

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "validly named" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing whether something has been appropriately or correctly given a name or title. Example: "The species was validly named according to the rules of taxonomy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

23 human-written examples

Megalosaurus was, in 1824, the first genus of non-avian dinosaur to be validly named.

Wikipedia

The species was first described in the scientific literature in 1786, but not validly named until 1803.

Wikipedia

In 1868/1869 Edward Drinker Cope proposed a family Scelidosauridae in a double lecture but this was only published in December 1871; therefore it was Thomas Henry Huxley who validly named the Scelidosauridae in 1869.

Wikipedia

The lemma text contained a diagnosis, implicating that the genus was validly named and was not a nomen nudum, despite the fact that the definition was vague and no specimens were identified.

Wikipedia

Olson presumed that the National Geographic article had already validly named the fossil, and he therefore failed to explicitly indicate the name was new, as demanded by article 16 of the ICZN as a condition for a name to be valid.

Wikipedia

Lists previous names for the organism if validly named.

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

37 human-written examples

We took advantage of the possibility offered by our data set to compute the genetic variability of all the other validly names species or genomic species in the genus (table 1 for clades with at least three genomes and supplementary table S5, Supplementary Material online, for all).

Genome Biology and Evolution

The reanalysis bears on whether craniometrics, the measurement of skull shape, can validly identify ethnic origin.

The New York Times - Science

"She can validly make the case she is turning it around, but investors are an impatient bunch".

The New York Times

That is hardly what anyone could validly call a tax increase.

Huffington Post

The formal, validly published names are explained in detail in [1] with key defining characters, except for four modifications here, i.e. accepting Eurybacteria [69] as a genuine, but slightly revised, phylum and Selenobacteria as a class (originally phylum [142]), placing both Selenobacteria and Thermotogales in Eurybacteria, and revising the circumscription of Gracilicutes.

Biology Direct

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing taxonomic classifications, ensure that the term "validly named" is used in conjunction with the specific rules and codes that govern nomenclature in that field, such as the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) or the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN).

Common error

Do not assume that a commonly used name is necessarily "validly named". A name might be widely used in informal contexts but not recognized under the formal rules of nomenclature. Always verify the validity of a name through official databases or taxonomic authorities.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "validly named" functions as an adjective modifying a noun, typically referring to a species, genus, or other taxonomic rank. It indicates that the naming of the entity adheres to the established rules and conventions of the relevant naming authority. As Ludwig AI suggests, this is the appropriate way of using the adjective "validly".

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

75%

Wiki

20%

News & Media

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "validly named" is a grammatically correct and commonly used term, primarily found in scientific and academic contexts. Ludwig AI's analysis confirms its appropriateness for formal communication, especially when discussing taxonomic classifications and nomenclature. When using this phrase, it's crucial to ensure that the naming adheres to the established rules and codes, such as the ICZN or ICN. Remember that common usage doesn't guarantee validity; always verify names through official databases or taxonomic authorities to avoid confusion and maintain scientific rigor.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

correctly designated

Focuses on the accuracy of the designation process.

properly identified

Emphasizes the accuracy of the identification.

officially recognized

Highlights the formal recognition of the name.

legitimately titled

Focuses on the legitimacy of the title.

appropriately designated

Stresses the appropriateness of the designation.

formally classified

Highlights the formal classification process.

rightfully called

Emphasizes the rightfulness of the name.

accurately termed

Focuses on the accuracy of the term used.

duly designated

Emphasizes that the designation followed proper procedures.

soundly named

Highlights the validity and reason behind the name.

FAQs

How is the term "validly named" used in scientific nomenclature?

In scientific nomenclature, "validly named" refers to a species or taxon that has been named according to the specific rules outlined by the governing international code (e.g., ICZN, ICN). It implies that the name has been published correctly with a proper description and type specimen.

What happens if a species is not "validly named"?

If a species is not "validly named", it does not have official recognition in the scientific community. This can lead to confusion and inconsistencies in research. The species may be referred to by an unofficial name or a placeholder until it is properly described and named according to the relevant code.

What are some alternatives to "validly named"?

Depending on the context, alternatives to "validly named" could include "correctly designated", "properly identified", or "officially recognized". These phrases all convey the idea that the naming process has been carried out accurately and in accordance with established rules.

What criteria must be met for a name to be considered "validly named"?

The criteria for a name to be considered "validly named" vary depending on the specific code of nomenclature being followed. Generally, the name must be effectively published, accompanied by a description (or diagnosis), and the type specimen (or type species) must be designated and accessible.