Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Face validity was tested by 15 people for comprehension.
COSMIC data were analyzed and their validity was tested by comparison with ground-based measurements.
Content validity was tested by measuring the floor and ceiling effects.
COSMIC RO data were analyzed and their validity was tested by comparison with ground-based measurements.
The construct validity was tested with factor analysis that showed 7 factors.
All canonical correlation (RC) showed values of less than 1.00 signalling that discriminant validity was tested and acceptable.
Divergent validity was tested using Rosenberg's Self-Esteem scale (1965), and a hypothetically-unrelated prisoner's self-rating of overall health.
Construct (convergent and divergent) validity was tested by correlating the IKDC/SKF-GR with a generic quality of life scale (SF-36) [25] including all participants (n = 80).
Construct validity was tested by correlating the IKDC/SKF-GR with the SF-36 subscales (n = 80) and content validity by measuring floor/ceiling effects.
Initial content validity was explored through systematic review by experts, and face validity was tested by pre-piloting with 23 volunteers.
The construct validity was tested by comparing indicator level scores between virtual and physical surveys using three statistical measures i.e., % agreement, Kappa Coefficient, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com