Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(24)
Furthermore, the internal validity was evaluated using 10-fold cross validation.
Scale validity was evaluated using content and structure validity.
Validity was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity and global value.
Construct validity was evaluated using item-total correlations and convergent and discriminant validity.
Validity was evaluated using Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficients and resulted in 0.99.
Validity was evaluated using known-groups validity, convergent validity and factor structure validity.
Similar(36)
Construct and discriminant validity were evaluated using the AD-Maker competence questions, symptom and functioning scales, and clinical and demographic characteristics.
Convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated using Spearman correlation.
Validity is evaluated using mean difference of RAV score and P score.
Reliability, for inter- and intrarater, and validity were evaluated using ICC.
Internal consistency, longitudinal and cross-sectional validity were evaluated using data from all patients.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com