Sentence examples for validity was evaluated through from inspiring English sources

Convergent validity was evaluated through the correlation across measures in reactivity to the stimulus.

Finally, criterion validity was evaluated through Person's Correlations between the scale and associated variables, while group differences were examined using the Student-t test and ANCOVA.

Construct validity was evaluated through Pearson's correlation between PCM subscales and subscales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy--General (FACT-G), the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy--Fatigue (FACIT-F).

Convergent validity was evaluated through the average variance extracted (AVE), which accounts for the proportion of variance in the items that is explained by the underlying factor, and is considered appropriate when AVE >0.5 (Fornell and Larcker 1981; Marôco 2014).

Criterion validity was evaluated through the association with related variables, such as age and school failure, as well as the scale's ability to capture group differences, namely between genders and school retentions, and finally by comparing a sub-group of convicted adolescents with a group of non-convicted ones regarding their engagement in delinquent activities.

Validity was evaluated through convergent and discriminant validity.

Construct validity was evaluated only through correlation analysis.

Construct validity was evaluated within a confirmatory factor analytic framework.

Scale validity was evaluated using content and structure validity.

Validity was evaluated using known-groups validity, convergent validity and factor structure validity.

Construct validity was evaluated using item-total correlations and convergent and discriminant validity.