Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
Interventions: Instrument validity was determined by comparing the system's performance with a validated goniometer measure.
Validity was determined by peer debriefing in which the entire research team reviewed, validated, and verified all interpretations and conclusions of the data (consensual validity).
Criterion validity was determined by comparing stated and actual WTP.
Content validity was determined through observation of actual trading of untreated nets together with interviews with sellers and consumers.
Construct validity was determined by the ability to differentiate the group with a high pain level before analgesia and after analgesia (P<0.002).
Validity was determined by comparing noninvasive measures of pelvic and hip angles to radiographic measures by using correlation, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and regression.
Construct validity was determined by the ability to differentiate the group with no pain before surgery and a high pain level after surgery, before analgesia (P<0.001).
Predictive validity was determined by the degree to which high stages at admission predict discharge to the community and low stages at admission predict serious morbidity or mortality.
Content validity was determined through two approaches.
Criterion validity was determined through correlations with existing instruments.
Discriminant validity was determined using the known-groups method.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com