Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Discriminant validity was assessed in two ways.
Content validity was assessed by 13 headache experts.
Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA).
Content validity was assessed using the content validity ratio approach.
Predictive validity was assessed for both instruments' scores.
Face validity was assessed with a 5-item Likert-scale.
Methods: Content validity was assessed by a panel of experts.
Validity was assessed by means of Spearman's correlation coefficient.
Construct validity was assessed by EFA, extracting two factors, accounting for 71.9% of the variance.
Data validity was assessed by a reference group of subject-matter experts.
Statistical conclusion validity was assessed through an examination of sample size and data analysis technique.
More suggestions(15)
validity was examined
adequacy was assessed
validity was appraised
order was assessed
accuracy was assessed
validity was estimated
validity was analysed
validity was addressed
validity was evaluated
applicability was assessed
soundness was assessed
validity was measured
appropriateness was assessed
effectiveness was assessed
validity was ensured
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com