Exact(3)
Construct validity was analyzed through convergent validity and discriminant validity.
Known-groups validity was analyzed through the ability of the instrument to differentiate between students who studied in traditional versus research-based laboratory courses.
Known-groups validity was analyzed through the comparison of the WE-CARE scores across groups of children with type 1 diabetes with different health status.
Similar(57)
Construct validity were analyzed through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), which confirmed the structure obtained from the original version [ 11].
Discriminant validity was analyzed comparing the squared correlation between factors with the AVE of each factor.
Construct validity was analyzed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA).
The convergent validity was analyzed in two ways.
Construct validity was analyzed using traditional indices [ 23].
Convergent validity of MIDAS was analyzed through the assessment of correlation between MIDAS and SF-36 scores.
Discriminanting validity between follow-up groups was analyzed through the ES [ 37, 39] and was calculated between the follow-up at year-1 and the other follow-up patient groups (mean deltas divided by the standard deviation of the group at year-1).
Reliability and validity were analyzed using SAS, with the other statistics analyzed through JMP (version 9.02, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Carolina).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com