Sentence examples for validity rating from inspiring English sources

If (tilde{A}) and (tilde{B}) are two GLRFNs, validity rating of (Apreceq B) is belong to interval (mathrm{VR}(Apreceq B =[t_{Apreceq B},1-f_{Apreceq B}]) where (t_{Apreceq B}) minimum accuracy and 1-f_{Apreceq B}}) maximum accuracy.

Assume that (tilde{A}) and (tilde{B}) be two GLRFNs, validity rating of (Apreceq B) is belong to interval ([t_{Apreceq B},1-f_{Apreceq B}]) where (t_{Apreceq B}) minimum accuracy and 1-f_{Apreceq B}}) maximum accuracy and we show with vague value of rank (tilde{A}preceq tilde{B}) with (mathrm{VR}(Apreceq B)) where mathrm{VR}(Apreceq B =[t_{Apreceq B},1-f_{Apreceq B}] (9).

The maximum possible score was 16 and the minimum was 0. The final validity rating was reached by consensus.

The final disposition of each indicator was based on the median validity rating, median feasibility rating, and agreement among panellists expressed as a percentage.

Phase One was development of an instrument to measure quality of prenatal care, and included item generation, content validity, rating of importance of items, and item presentation.

Likert-scale, open- and closed-ended questions were constructed by the method of Dillman and underwent formal content validity rating by genomics researchers (n = 5), with a final rating of 0.87 for individual questions and the instrument overall.

We discuss factors that may be related to the differences in validity rates.

Validity rates of the Personality Assessment Inventory and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 in a VA Medical Center Setting.

In this study, we compared protocol validity rates between the MMPI-2 (Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) and the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI; Morey, 1991) in a veteran population.

In fact, members of the SAFE California Campaign collected so many signatures with such a high validity rate that we qualified even earlier than we expected.

The validation of the SNP genotyping for 15 SNPs × 24 genotypes was conducted by Sanger sequencing and a validity rate of 99.2% was obtained.