Sentence examples for validity rate from inspiring English sources

The validation of the SNP genotyping for 15 SNPs × 24 genotypes was conducted by Sanger sequencing and a validity rate of 99.2% was obtained.

These data are similar to the previous findings about the accuracy of parent-reported data, and a high ASD diagnosis validity rate from the IAN database.

Of the surveys collected, 841 were valid, while the remaining 51 were invalid owing to incomplete data, resulting in a validity rate of 94.3%.

The library construction method (through the excess of oligo dT) during the first reverse transcription) led to short polyA 3'-end stretches, allowing almost the same validity rate of the sequences either from 5' (82.2%) or 3' (80.9% -end.

If (tilde{A}) and (tilde{B}) are two GLRFNs, validity rating of (Apreceq B) is belong to interval (mathrm{VR}(Apreceq B =[t_{Apreceq B},1-f_{Apreceq B}]) where (t_{Apreceq B}) minimum accuracy and 1-f_{Apreceq B}}) maximum accuracy.

Assume that (tilde{A}) and (tilde{B}) be two GLRFNs, validity rating of (Apreceq B) is belong to interval ([t_{Apreceq B},1-f_{Apreceq B}]) where (t_{Apreceq B}) minimum accuracy and 1-f_{Apreceq B}}) maximum accuracy and we show with vague value of rank (tilde{A}preceq tilde{B}) with (mathrm{VR}(Apreceq B)) where mathrm{VR}(Apreceq B =[t_{Apreceq B},1-f_{Apreceq B}] (9).

The maximum possible score was 16 and the minimum was 0. The final validity rating was reached by consensus.

The final disposition of each indicator was based on the median validity rating, median feasibility rating, and agreement among panellists expressed as a percentage.

Phase One was development of an instrument to measure quality of prenatal care, and included item generation, content validity, rating of importance of items, and item presentation.

Each type of content validity rating was given a score between 1 and 5. (A score of "1" denoted the lowest level of content validity evidence, and a "5" represented the highest).

Likert-scale, open- and closed-ended questions were constructed by the method of Dillman and underwent formal content validity rating by genomics researchers (n = 5), with a final rating of 0.87 for individual questions and the instrument overall.