Sentence examples for validity of the draft from inspiring English sources

To test the face and content validity of the draft HAE PRO, in-depth, open-ended and cognitive debriefing interviews were performed with HAE patients in the UK (n = 10), Brazil (n = 10), Germany (n = 11) and France (n = 12).

To test the face validity of the draft questionnaire, focus groups were organised by the HLS-EU project partners in Ireland (JF, GD), Greece (BK, DA) and the Netherlands (VS, KS, SvdB).

To investigate the content validity of the draft GLIA, we systematically examined each item's clarity, its relevance to its superordinate dimension, and the comprehensiveness of the GLIA as a whole [ 21].

The face validity of the draft questionnaire was tested with help from music conservatory students from the Carl Nielsen Academy of Music, Odense, Denmark, who filled in the questionnaire and commented on the comprehensibility of the questionnaire, any disambiguity of questions, and the relevance of the topics.

The face validity and content validity of the draft questionnaire were assessed individually by five experts in the field of nursing care: two researchers in this field, two individuals with considerable practical knowledge of working as a nurse, and one representative of the Ministry of Health.

The questions used for answering the research questions addressed in this paper are shown in Additional file 1. Face validity, content validity and comprehensibility of the draft questionnaire were assessed by the steering committee, which included three scientists in the field of end-of-life care and two GPs.

In order to assess the content and face validity of the questionnaire, the draft version was initially evaluated by a group of 8 HAE-C1-INH experts and subsequently by a group of 16 HAE-C1-INH patients, all from different regions of Spain (expert and patient rating phase).

We also examined the face validity of the GeDI-Draft 2.

We evaluated communication validity of the GeDI-Draft 1 by administering it to 161 nonmajors enrolled in a biology course (Table 2).

The Rasch measurement model was used to evaluate the scaling properties and construct validity of the 52-item draft questionnaire [ 10].

The face validity of the first questionnaire draft was initially assessed amongst 61 adolescents, aged between 11 and 16 years (mean: 13.3 ± 1.1).