Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(3)
Moreover, condition (85) implies the validity of inclusion (24) (see Proposition 4.8).
The validity of inclusion of these trials has been questioned.
The conduct of this meta-analysis itself raises a number of important methodological questions, including the validity of inclusion of studies, the use of estimates adjusted for covariates, and the statistical significance of estimates based on meta-analysis of the epidemiological data.
Similar(57)
Hence, the validity of the inclusion (Xisubseteqoperatorname{cl}_{mu} Xi_{Delta}) is not a clear issue.
Therefore, according to (77) and (79), Proposition 4.7 guarantees the validity of the inclusion − ℓ 1 ∈ V ˜ a b − ( h − ), (97).
Therefore, by virtue of (70) and (72), Proposition 4.7 guarantees the validity of the inclusion − ℓ 1 ∈ V ˜ a b − ( h ).
On the other hand, both conditions (A) and (B) of the corollary guarantee the validity of the inclusion − ℓ 1 ∈ V ˜ a b − ( h ).
According to conditions (11 - 13 11 - 13e andumpthen ℓ 0 ∈ P assumptionsition 4.2 guarantees the validity of the inclusion − ℓ 1 ∈ V ˜ a b − ( h ).
Choosing suitable functions γ in the propositions stated above, we can derive several efficient conditions sufficient for the validity of the inclusion ℓ ∈ V ˜ a b − ( h ).
Remark 2.1 As we have mentioned above, assumption (1.7) in Theorem 2.1 is necessary for the validity of the inclusion ( p, τ, μ ) ∈ S ac ( D ) in the case where inequality (1.5) holds (see [12]).
Some sufficient conditions for the validity of the inclusion ℓ ∈ V ˜ a b − ( h ), which are part of the conditions for the main results, are given in Section 4.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com