Sentence examples for validity of a judgment from inspiring English sources

In Darrance v. Preston, 18 Iowa, 396, the distinction is pointed out between the validity of a judgment as to the amount realized from the sale of property within the jurisdiction of the court and its validity beyond that amount.

Otherwise put, and fully spelled-out, the objective validity of a judgment is its anthropocentric rational empirical referential meaningfulness.

The characteristically rational activity of taking-for-true implies the subjective validity of a judgment, or its apparent meaningfulness and apparent truth for an individual rational cognizer.

In this way the objective validity of a judgment is equivalent to its propositional truth-valuedness, but not equivalent to its propositional truth.

A necessary but not sufficient condition of the objective validity of a judgment is its logico-syntactic well-formedness (grammatical correctness) and logico-semantic well-formedness (sortal correctness) (A73/98, A240 248/B300 305).

Other characteristics such as criterion and convergent validity of the measure will be desirable but hard to achieve.The major threat to the validity of such a judgment is hindsight bias.

The question here respects only the validity of a money judgment rendered in one State, in an action upon a simple contract against the resident of another, without service of process upon him, or his appearance therein.

Just as a right-acting person respects the life of all beings, so a right-thinking person acknowledges the validity of all judgments.

By contrast, the "objective validity" (objektiv Gültigkeit) of a judgment is its empirical meaningfulness, precisely because it is compositionally based on the empirical "reference" (Beziehung)—whether singular or comprehensional of the basic constituent objective representations of any judgment, namely intuitions and concepts.

81 The issue in this case involves the validity of a seizure before judgment under s.

"The burden of demonstrating that an erroneous instruction was so prejudicial that it will support a collateral attack on the constitutional validity of a state court's judgment is even greater than the showing required to establish plain error on direct appeal". Henderson v. Kibbe, 431 U.S. 145, 154, 97 S.Ct.