Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Several studies examined different facets of validity, ascertaining both concurrent validity —sensitivities of 69%to100%00 %, specificities of 65%to94%94 %, and areas under the Receiver Operating Curve (AUROC) varying from 0.77 to 0.91 [ 17– 21]— and construct validity —correlations between the IQCODE and cognitive screening tests and neuropsychological tests ranging from −0.12 to −0.78 [ 17, 22].
Similar(59)
Only 7 out of 27 instruments (26%) were found to have had both reliability and validity ascertained [ 33, 35, 37, 40, 43, 49, 52].
Face validity was ascertained through structured discussion groups.
External validity was ascertained by way of stratified random sampling, and obtaining a correct composition and adequate sample size.
Content validity was ascertained in cooperation with the national steering board for postgraduate medical education, consisting of the officers in charge and trainees of the different medical disciplines.
The content validity is ascertained during a qualitative phase which includes a literature search, interviews with experts, and patient focus groups.
The evaluation of the test battery was divided into three parts: A. test-retest reliability to determine amount of measurement error in the computer tests; B. validity to ascertain that scores of the computerized tests co-vary with scores on their conventional paper and pencil test correlates, and; C. ability to complete the test for INPH patients.
Special emphasis was given to ascertaining validity for young and middle-aged patients with osteoarthritis (OA).
The content validation was ascertained via expert validity and the inclusion criteria were set at a CVI larger than 0.80; in addition, the CVI of above selected thirty-eight nursing intervention items was 1.0.
Ascertaining the validity of this interpretation would require following youth with type 1 diabetes as they age into adulthood to determine change in rate of insulin omission.
Ascertaining the validity of this interpretation would require following adults with type 2 diabetes as they age to determine change in rate of insulin omission.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com