Sentence examples for validity are shown from inspiring English sources

Failed tests with item convergent validity are shown as underlined.

Item- scale correlations with item- convergent validity are shown in bold typing.

The results of testing for construct validity are shown in Table 4.

The results of the overall fit, item and fit statistics referring to construct validity are shown in Table  3.

PCS: Physical Component Summary; MCS: Mental Component Summary The correlation coefficients among the dimensions of the KTQ, which evaluate the construct validity, are shown in Table 3.

* p < 0.05, † Higher score indicates worse QOL ‡ missing in 7, § missing in 5, ‖ missing in 2. Results of convergent validity are shown in Table 6.

Validity is shown by comparison with cell counts.

The absence of a direct comparison prevents a criterion standard from being established; however, content validity was shown by expert peer review.

Convergent validity was established via correlations between the AFS and established measures of adolescent functioning and parenting, and discriminant validity was shown through no association between the AFS and a measure of technology use.

The formula of a general solution for these impulsive fractional partial differential equations is found by considering some limiting cases (impulses tending to zero), and its validity is shown by an example.

Construct validity was shown by scale responsiveness to painful stimuli (4.6 times increase in scores across phases) and the capacity of the scale to distinguish between painful versus nonpainful procedures (P < .001).001