Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

validation of training

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "validation of training" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to assessing or confirming the effectiveness of a training program or process. Example: "The validation of training is essential to ensure that employees are acquiring the necessary skills and knowledge."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

This will require greater population sizes and external validation of training profiles and components of profiles in independent populations of subjects with type 1 and type 2 diabetes and should be the focus of a further study.

Science

Plosone

A simple Bayesian classifier analyzing the autosomal AIM-SNPs allowed an assessment of their ability to differentiate Europeans and North Africans by cross validation of training set samples used in the likelihood calculations.

Science

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

After the cross-validation of training set, the independent test set was evaluated by using the trained model with the highest accuracy.

Systematic comparisons with the existing prediction models demonstrated that APCpred method significantly improved the prediction accuracy both in fivefold cross-validation of training datasets and in independent blind datasets.

Using the other five datasets, we compared APCpred with several exiting methods, and the results demonstrated that the APCpred method improved the prediction of B-cell linear epitopes both in fivefold cross-validation of training dataset and in blind testing of validation datasets.

The kernel function namely Radial Basis Function (RBF) is used to find the best cross validation accuracy of training data with parameter, C and γ.

To assure good training, for each setting, GMM distribution is trained 20 times using EM with random initialization and the best model is selected based on a validation subset of training data.

One replicate of each A431, H358, H460, H1975, and K562 was used for validation of the training model and a single replicate of each of the training lines omitted from the original models.

In addition, the results on 5% training data, is likely to be more useful in real-time systems as in real applications the size of the test data keeps on growing at a rate higher than the training data, mainly because of the labor intensive processes involved in the preparation and validation of the training data.

Cross validation of the training sets proved valuable ahead of deciding how to genotype limited case material as it allowed an assessment of both the accuracy and performance of the AIM-SNP ancestry test.

Science

Plosone

The best scoring model for the mixed set was using 9 features (Mann-Whitney p-value filter of 0.044) and had a predicted accuracy of 84.1% according to ten-fold cross validation of the training set.

Science

Plosone
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing "validation of training", specify the criteria used for validation to provide context and demonstrate rigor. For example, indicate whether you're focusing on skill acquisition, performance improvement, or knowledge retention.

Common error

Avoid claiming comprehensive "validation of training" if only specific aspects were assessed. Clearly define the boundaries of what was validated to maintain accuracy and credibility.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "validation of training" functions as a noun phrase, often used as the subject or object of a sentence. It describes the process or act of validating training programs or methods, as seen in the Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "validation of training" is a noun phrase used to describe the process of confirming the effectiveness of training programs, as supported by Ludwig. Primarily found in formal and scientific contexts, it emphasizes the importance of evidence-based assessment. While grammatically correct, its frequency is uncommon. The "validation of training" requires clear objectives, measurable outcomes and appropriate assessment methods.

FAQs

How can I ensure the "validation of training" is effective?

Effective "validation of training" requires clear objectives, measurable outcomes, and appropriate assessment methods. Use a combination of pre- and post-training assessments, performance evaluations, and feedback surveys to gather comprehensive data.

What are some alternatives to "validation of training"?

You can use alternatives like "assessment of training effectiveness", "evaluation of training programs", or "confirmation of training outcomes" depending on the context.

Why is "validation of training" important in professional development?

"Validation of training" ensures that professional development programs are meeting their objectives and providing value to participants. It helps organizations to identify areas for improvement and optimize their training investments.

What's the difference between "validation of training" and "testing training validity"?

"Validation of training" refers to the overall process of confirming the effectiveness of a training program, while "testing training validity" specifically examines whether the training accurately measures what it intends to measure.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: