Suggestions(2)
Exact(3)
Validation of criteria relevance and linearity of the scales is a prerequisite to ensuring that evaluation will be scientifically correct.
Systematic studies into the validation of criteria for treatment assignment are lacking [ 10], and it is primarily up to the clinicians' judgement whether children are assigned to one form of treatment or the other.
Validation of criteria relevance and linearity of the scales – a prerequisite for a correct evaluation process – was obtained by implementing a paired test approach 16– 18 that consisted of a classification by 15 volunteers in standardized conditions of lighting, position, and screen calibration of each grade for a considered scale by comparing all the possible pairs of two grades.
Similar(57)
Baseline data of these patients (N = 545) were available for validation of criterion-based patient assignment to the present modularized headache treatment program.
In AD, the development of clinical diagnostic criteria [ 64] and the retrospective validation of these criteria using consensus diagnosis and neuropathology as a gold standard [ 77] long preceded prospective longitudinal validation.
The pioneering use of the criteria for near miss recently defined by the WHO [ 5] may permit validation of these criteria for later studies on a worldwide level.
Validation of clinical criteria using microscopic agglutination test as the gold standard has been done in 1995 by Brato and colleagues in the Philippine General Hospital [ 5], but such a study has not been conducted in Sri Lanka.
The systematic content analysis of qualitative data led to the proposal and validation of design criteria at three levels.
Validation of toxicity criteria and the statistical issues involved in analyzing this type of data are presented with special emphasis on descriptors of the time evolution of toxicity.
In thecriteria of Wells et al. [6], the most frequently used tool for assessing the clinical probability of PE, pregnant patients were excluded in the validation of the criteria.
In the validation of clinical criteria for sepsis, unfortunately, there was no clear mention to the added benefit of lactate for patients with SOFA scores <2, possibly because of lactate values missingness in the derivation (about 60%) and validation cohorts (about 90%) [10].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com