Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(48)
Significant positive correlations between the KINDEX sum score and the global values assessed in the validation interview indicate high concurrent validity of the KINDEX.
All interviewers and interpreters of the validation interview were blind with respect to the outcome of the screening interview.
We also examined the criterion-related concurrent validity of the tool through a validation interview carried out by an expert clinical psychologist.
Significant correlations between the results obtained through the assessment using the KINDEX and the risk areas of stress, psychopathology and trauma load assessed in the validation interview demonstrate the criterion-related concurrent validity of the KINDEX.
Moderately high, positive correlations between the KINDEX sum score and the global stress, global psychopathology and global trauma load assessed in the validation interview, indicate that the KINDEX has good concurrent validity.
The interviewer was blind regarding the KINDEX assessment before the validation interview to avoid any bias.
Similar(12)
The validity study was performed through content validation interviews with palliative care experts, discussing their experiences using PPS.
Selection criteria receiving ratings of >3.6 (an average of all 18 mean scores) by one or two measures were to receive further consideration by means of validation interviews.
Validation interviews were conducted by telephone with people with type 1 diabetes (n = 2) and type 2 diabetes (n = 6), expert clinicians (n = 2) and one nurse in the UK.
Sources of data include semi-structured interviews conducted with 130 residents, transect walks with two expert herders, a focus group discussion with six expert herders, validation interviews with two wazee (highly respected elders, plural), two participatory mapping exercises and with additional contributions from lengthy participant observation.
Table 1 compares the PTSD diagnosis based on the screening and the validation interviews, (62 subjects).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com