The other two instruments the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale and the Life Stress Questionnaire were translated and validated following the model of cultural validation proposed by Van Ommeren et al. [ 29], which triangulates information from translators and key informants with the findings from focus groups with homologous participants.
The Spanish version of the SDLRSNE scale was validated following the steps proposed by Vallerand for transcultural validation [ 36]. – Satisfaction, measured in two ways.
Finally, the CE method was successfully validated following the ICH Q2R1 guidelines.
The optimized method was validated following ICH Guideline Q2(R1) and was applied to a real sample of ALM coated tablets.
The method was validated following an approach using accuracy profiles based on β-expectation tolerance intervals for the total error measurement, and assessing the measurements uncertainty.
The developed method was validated following ICH Guideline Q2(R1), including robustness assessment by Plackett Burman design, and was applied to the analysis of real samples of amitriptyline coated tablets.
Using different operators, different analysis dates and different ambient conditions the method was fully validated following the guidance of ICH Q2(R1).
This method can be easily transferred for use in research laboratories, making accessible the quantitative analysis of CNT samples, and has been validated following ISO/IEC 17025:2005 for linearity, specificity, intermediate precision, limits of detection and quantification.
The in-process method was successfully validated following the principles described within The International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use – ICH Q2 (r1) – Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology.
The method was validated following a holistic approach that included not only the classical parameters related to method performance but also the robustness and the expected proportion of acceptable results lying inside predefined acceptability intervals, i.e., the uncertainty of measurements.
The survey was designed and validated following the recommendations of the following authors: Kasunic [13] and Lethbridge [14].
