Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
validated on
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "validated on" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the process of confirming or verifying something, typically in a technical or scientific context. Example: "The results of the experiment were validated on multiple datasets to ensure accuracy."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Atlas validation: The template was validated on 16 subjects.
Science
Validated on a sample of 729 children.
The method was validated on simulated data.
Science
Growth hackers are validated on a post-hoc basis.
News & Media
It has been validated on 100s of handsets.
News & Media
The approach is validated on experimental data.
Science
The proposed method is validated on simulated and experimental data.
However, most approaches were only validated on selected examples.
Science
Synthetic signals that represent the symbols was validated on hardware.
D-MUSICAL has previously been validated on simulated data [26].
Consequently, models can be trained and validated on different datasets.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "validated on", specify the type of data or methods used for validation to provide context and credibility.
Common error
Avoid stating that something is simply "validated" without mentioning the specific criteria or data used for validation, which can weaken the claim's impact.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "validated on" serves as a passive construction indicating that a method, model, or result has undergone a process of confirmation or verification using specific data, methods, or conditions. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely applicable.
Frequent in
Science
80%
News & Media
10%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "validated on" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, particularly in scientific and technical writing, to denote that a method, model, or result has been rigorously confirmed using specific data or conditions. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is generally considered correct. When employing "validated on", ensure you explicitly mention the data or methods used for validation to strengthen your claim's credibility. Common alternatives include "confirmed by" and "verified using", but it is important to select a phrase that aligns with the specific context. Remember to avoid vague statements by always specifying how the validation was performed. Finally, be aware that you should not use this phrase in informal contexts.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
confirmed by
Focuses on the act of confirming something through evidence, differing from validation which implies a more rigorous process.
verified using
Emphasizes the method used for verification, whereas "validated on" highlights the subject of validation.
tested with
Highlights the act of testing, implying that validation is a result of the testing process.
supported by
Indicates that evidence or data supports a claim or method, similar to validation but less formal.
substantiated through
Suggests a more thorough and detailed confirmation process.
proven via
Emphasizes the result of proving something through a particular method.
experimentally verified on
Specifically highlights experimental verification, adding a layer of scientific rigor.
assessed using
Focuses on the assessment process, which can lead to validation but doesn't inherently imply it.
corroborated with
Suggests that validation is achieved through multiple sources of evidence.
demonstrated through
Emphasizes the act of demonstrating validity rather than directly validating.
FAQs
How can I use "validated on" in a sentence?
Use "validated on" to describe the testing or confirmation of a method, model, or tool using specific data or conditions. For example, "The algorithm was validated on a large dataset of medical images."
What are some alternatives to "validated on"?
Depending on the context, alternatives include "confirmed by", "verified using", or "supported by". Choose the phrase that best reflects the nature of the verification process.
Is it correct to say "the results were validated on"?
Yes, "the results were validated on" is grammatically correct. It indicates that the results have undergone a validation process using specific data or methods.
What's the difference between "validated on" and "tested on"?
"Validated on" implies a more rigorous and comprehensive evaluation process than "tested on". Validation suggests that the method or tool has been proven effective and reliable, while testing simply indicates that it has been subjected to testing procedures.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested