Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

validated on

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "validated on" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the process of confirming or verifying something, typically in a technical or scientific context. Example: "The results of the experiment were validated on multiple datasets to ensure accuracy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Atlas validation: The template was validated on 16 subjects.

Validated on a sample of 729 children.

The method was validated on simulated data.

Growth hackers are validated on a post-hoc basis.

News & Media

TechCrunch

It has been validated on 100s of handsets.

News & Media

TechCrunch

The approach is validated on experimental data.

The proposed method is validated on simulated and experimental data.

However, most approaches were only validated on selected examples.

Synthetic signals that represent the symbols was validated on hardware.

D-MUSICAL has previously been validated on simulated data [26].

Consequently, models can be trained and validated on different datasets.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "validated on", specify the type of data or methods used for validation to provide context and credibility.

Common error

Avoid stating that something is simply "validated" without mentioning the specific criteria or data used for validation, which can weaken the claim's impact.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "validated on" serves as a passive construction indicating that a method, model, or result has undergone a process of confirmation or verification using specific data, methods, or conditions. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely applicable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

80%

News & Media

10%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "validated on" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, particularly in scientific and technical writing, to denote that a method, model, or result has been rigorously confirmed using specific data or conditions. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is generally considered correct. When employing "validated on", ensure you explicitly mention the data or methods used for validation to strengthen your claim's credibility. Common alternatives include "confirmed by" and "verified using", but it is important to select a phrase that aligns with the specific context. Remember to avoid vague statements by always specifying how the validation was performed. Finally, be aware that you should not use this phrase in informal contexts.

FAQs

How can I use "validated on" in a sentence?

Use "validated on" to describe the testing or confirmation of a method, model, or tool using specific data or conditions. For example, "The algorithm was validated on a large dataset of medical images."

What are some alternatives to "validated on"?

Depending on the context, alternatives include "confirmed by", "verified using", or "supported by". Choose the phrase that best reflects the nature of the verification process.

Is it correct to say "the results were validated on"?

Yes, "the results were validated on" is grammatically correct. It indicates that the results have undergone a validation process using specific data or methods.

What's the difference between "validated on" and "tested on"?

"Validated on" implies a more rigorous and comprehensive evaluation process than "tested on". Validation suggests that the method or tool has been proven effective and reliable, while testing simply indicates that it has been subjected to testing procedures.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: