validate the explanation for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "validate the explanation for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to confirm or support the reasoning or justification behind a particular explanation or statement. Example: "The committee will validate the explanation for the project's unexpected delays before making any decisions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

The explanation for this sudden change?

The Economist

The explanation for this bonanza is simple.

The New York Times

The explanation for this is politics.

The Washington Post

The explanation for this error is clear.

Cornell University

What might be the explanation for that?

Harvard University

The explanation for that incessant hunger?

BBC

What is the explanation for that?

Los Angeles Times

The explanation for this discrepancy remains unknown.

Plosone

The explanations for "cripping up" are obvious.

The Guardian - Opinion

Although there are differences in the quantity of physicians and nurses across the hospitals, this was not validated as an explanation for the differences in mortality.

BMJ Open

What would the explanation be for that?

HuffPost

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "validate the explanation for", ensure that you provide clear criteria or methods for how the validation will be conducted. Specify the evidence or data that will be used to confirm the explanation's accuracy or completeness.

Common error

Avoid validating an explanation based solely on personal opinions or beliefs. Instead, prioritize objective evidence and verifiable data to support the validation process. Base your validation on rigorous testing and evidence-based confirmation to ensure the explanation's credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "validate the explanation for" functions as a directive or descriptive phrase indicating the need to confirm the reasoning or justification behind a statement. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase itself is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "validate the explanation for" is grammatically sound and aims to emphasize the importance of verifying the reasoning behind an explanation. However, Ludwig's analysis reveals a lack of real-world examples for this particular phrase, indicating that it might not be commonly used in its exact form. As Ludwig AI has pointed out, the phrase is correct in written english. When using this phrase, ensure to provide clear methods or evidence for the validation process. Alternative phrases such as "verify the rationale for" or "confirm the justification for" may be considered to provide further clarity or formality.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

verify the rationale for

Replaces "validate" with "verify" and "explanation" with "rationale", focusing on confirming the underlying reasons.

confirm the justification for

Substitutes "validate" with "confirm" and "explanation" with "justification", emphasizing the act of proving something to be right or reasonable.

substantiate the reasons for

Uses "substantiate" to mean provide evidence for, and replaces "explanation" with "reasons", highlighting factual support.

prove the validity of the explanation

Focuses on proving the "validity" which explicitly addresses the correctness and soundness of the explanation.

corroborate the account of

Emphasizes supporting an account through evidence, where 'account' replaces 'explanation'.

authenticate the grounds for

Replaces "validate" with "authenticate", stressing the act of proving something is genuine. "Grounds" substitutes "explanation".

support the basis for

Uses "support" as a broader term for validating and replaces "explanation" with "basis", highlighting the foundational elements.

demonstrate the veracity of the explanation

Replaces "validate" with "demonstrate" and adds "veracity" to emphasize truthfulness.

test the soundness of the explanation

Replaces validate with test, and includes the 'soundness' which indicates the quality of the explanation.

justify the reasoning behind

This phrase uses 'justify' to imply providing reasons for, rather than directly validating the explanation itself.

FAQs

What does "validate the explanation for" mean?

It means to confirm or prove the accuracy, correctness, or soundness of the reasoning or justification behind a particular explanation.

How can I "validate the explanation for" a scientific finding?

You can "verify the rationale for" a scientific finding by replicating the experiment, conducting statistical analyses, and comparing the results with existing literature.

What's a formal alternative to "validate the explanation for"?

A more formal alternative is to "confirm the justification for", which emphasizes a more rigorous and official approval of the explanation.

Is it better to "validate the explanation for" or "test the explanation for"?

The choice depends on the context. "Validate the explanation for" implies confirming its correctness, while "test the explanation for" suggests examining its validity through experimentation or analysis.