Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

validate against errors

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "validate against errors" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to checking or verifying data, processes, or systems to ensure they are free from errors. Example: "Before finalizing the software, we need to validate against errors to ensure everything functions as intended."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

She validated all errors against data from the NASA Goddard's Cloud Absorption Radiometer, an airborne instrument that obtains tens of thousands of angular measurements of a ground spot.

The source BIND XML files validated, with minor errors, against the BIND XML schema.

Note that all CML documents now should validate against schema3.

The parameterized model was validated against experimental results, with the largest error and relative error of 0.08 μmol/m2/s and 10.5%, respectively.

The system was modeled using Engineering Equation Solver (EES) software and the model was validated against published data with maximum error of 1.14%.

The method was validated against an analytical solution with error less than 1.4% and with respect to an improved analytical solution for axisymmetric rod and eccentricity rod with error less than a 3.6%.

The dataset developed is fully validated against conventional procedures while the error induced in design by the use of older design aids is comparatively assessed, clearly highlighting the necessity for a new design charts dataset at least under certain loading and reinforcement configurations.

Extreme values were manually validated and no errors were identified.

Science

BMJ Open

When applied to the full image of the study site, our model had a 4.1% false-positive error rate as validated against an independent plot-level dataset of liana canopy cover.

Results were validated against an independent validation cohort.

The simulation results were validated against the experimental results using three methods of error analysis: root mean square percentage deviation (RMSPD), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and coefficient of determination (R2).

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "validate against errors", ensure the context clearly implies a verification process intended to identify and correct mistakes. Consider alternatives like "check for errors" for broader clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "validate against errors" when simpler phrases like "check for errors" or "verify accuracy" would suffice. Overly complex phrasing can reduce clarity and impact.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

75%

Authority and reliability

3.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "validate against errors" functions as a directive, often used in technical or scientific contexts. It specifies the action of verifying something to ensure it is free from errors. According to Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "validate against errors" is grammatically sound but not frequently used. It suggests a formal verification process, primarily suitable for technical and scientific contexts. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness. While acceptable, simpler alternatives like "check for errors" may enhance clarity in broader contexts. Though grammatically correct, you may find better alternatives for more frequent use.

FAQs

What does "validate against errors" mean?

The phrase "validate against errors" means to check or verify something to ensure it is free from mistakes or inaccuracies. It implies a process of confirming the correctness of data, a system, or a process.

What can I say instead of "validate against errors"?

You can use alternatives like "check for errors", "verify for mistakes", or "ensure accuracy" depending on the specific context.

Is "validate against errors" grammatically correct?

Yes, "validate against errors" is grammatically correct, but it can sometimes sound redundant. The word "validate" already implies checking for errors, so using alternatives might be more concise.

In what situations is it appropriate to use "validate against errors"?

The phrase "validate against errors" is most appropriate in technical or scientific contexts where a formal verification process is being described. In more informal contexts, simpler alternatives are generally preferred.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

75%

Authority and reliability

3.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: