Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

validate against

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"validate against" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to mean "check or verify something in order to prove its accuracy or legality." For example, "We need to validate against the customer database to confirm the shipping details."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

25 human-written examples

Attempts to validate against a physiological measure have been called validation against a "gold standard" (Swift et al. 2010).

However, no consensus yet exists in an international guideline regarding which assessment tool to use, and validation itself is problematic because of the lack of a standard to validate against that is not based on opinion.

Note that all CML documents now should validate against schema3.

We explore our data deeply so that we can validate against this established work.

We study convergence, computational effort, and validate against known solutions in the case of 2-layer media.

A comprehensive kinetic model for MB and MC combustion was developed, and applied to validate against the new experimental data.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

35 human-written examples

Results were validated against an independent validation cohort.

The results are validated against experiments.

Science

Carbon

Those results are then validated against Nielsen's Online Panels.

News & Media

TechCrunch

The code is validated against linear theory.

NIPCE is successfully validated against Monte Carlo simulation.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "validate against", ensure that the standard or criteria you are validating against is clearly defined and understood. This adds clarity and strengthens the argument being made.

Common error

Avoid using "validate against" when a simpler comparison would suffice. For instance, saying "compare with" is more appropriate if you are merely noting similarities rather than rigorously verifying accuracy.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

80%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "validate against" functions as a verb phrase that describes the action of verifying something's accuracy or correctness by comparing it with a known standard or established data. Ludwig AI confirms its frequent use.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

85%

News & Media

8%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "validate against" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase, primarily within scientific and technical domains. According to Ludwig AI, its purpose is to describe verifying something by comparing it to a standard. While alternatives like "verify against" or "check against" exist, "validate against" maintains a level of formality and rigor suitable for research and formal reporting. When employing the phrase, ensure that the standard is clearly defined to enhance the clarity and impact of your message.

FAQs

How do I use "validate against" in a sentence?

You can use "validate against" to describe the process of checking something against a known standard or data set. For example, "The model was validated against experimental results".

What's a good alternative to "validate against"?

Depending on the context, alternatives include "verify against", "check against", or "test against".

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "validate against"?

"Validate against" is often used in scientific, technical, and formal contexts where rigorous verification is required. It is common in research papers, technical reports, and quality assurance documentation.

Is there a difference between "validate against" and "validate with"?

While both phrases involve validation, "validate against" implies checking against a specific standard or dataset, whereas "validate with" might suggest validation using a tool or method. The choice depends on the precise context.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

80%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: